---
title: "Gorgias vs Zendesk (2026): An Honest Head-to-Head"
description: "Gorgias and Zendesk compared on six operational criteria with verified 2026 pricing. Gorgias bills per ticket and wins ecommerce depth, Zendesk bills per seat and wins governance and breadth, one ratio decides the cheaper base bill, and both charge again when the AI resolves."
url: https://www.richpanel.com/learn/gorgias-vs-zendesk
datePublished: 2026-07-28
dateModified: 2026-07-28
author: "Amit RG"
source: richpanel.com
---

# Gorgias vs Zendesk: the honest 2026 head-to-head, *and the ratio that decides it*

Gorgias is the ecommerce-native helpdesk, billed per ticket. Zendesk is the general-purpose enterprise standard, billed per seat. Because those two models invert, the cheaper one is settled by a single number you can work out in ten seconds: your tickets per agent per month. This guide defines the criteria first, publishes the arithmetic, then scores. The part neither vendor page leads with: on both platforms you pay for the ticket, and then you pay again when the AI resolves it.

## The short version, *before the detail*.

Most head-to-heads on this pairing bury the table two thirds of the way down, and several of the ones that rank are published by a vendor with a stake in the outcome. Here is the table first. The criteria behind it are defined in the next section, before any scoring, so you can audit the reasoning instead of trusting a rating.

| Criterion | Gorgias | Zendesk |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Pricing unit | Per billable ticket | Per agent seat |
| Entry price | Starter $10/mo, 50 tickets | Support Team $19/agent/mo |
| Mid tier | Pro $360/mo, 2,000 tickets | Suite Professional $115/agent/mo |
| Agent seats | Unlimited from Pro up | Every seat is billed |
| Ecommerce actions | Native in-ticket, AI can execute | Sidebar context plus some actions |
| AI price | $0.90 per resolved interaction, published | Per automated resolution, rate not published |
| AI included | 90 to 2,500+ interactions/mo | 5 to 15 resolutions per agent/mo |
| Governance and reporting | Lighter | Deeper: Explore, QA, audit, multi-brand |
| Voice | Add-on, from $70/mo plus usage | Talk per minute, Aircall resold |

**The one-line read:** choose **Gorgias** if your queue is an ecommerce queue and your team is large relative to your ticket volume, because seats cost you nothing there. Choose **Zendesk** if you need general-purpose breadth, reporting and governance depth, a procurement and security review to survive, or you run a lean team absorbing heavy volume. Both are mature, competent platforms, and neither is a bad answer for the buyer it fits. What follows is how each rating was earned, the arithmetic that settles the price question, and the one assumption both platforms share.

## Six criteria, defined *before the scoring*.

Defining criteria after a comparison is run is how vendor pages rig the result. So here are the six, each defined operationally, weighted for a support team of roughly 5 to 50 agents. If your context differs, a two-person shop or a 500-seat enterprise, the weights shift, and the text flags where.

1. **Total cost, fully loaded.** Not the headline number. The base platform, plus the AI meter, plus the add-ons, at your real volume and your real headcount.
2. **Ecommerce depth.** Whether order context and order actions live inside the ticket, and whether the AI can execute them rather than describe them.
3. **Scale and governance.** Multi-brand, roles and permissions, audit logs, quality assurance, and reporting depth as the operation grows.
4. **AI: unit, transparency, and honest resolution.** What the native AI does, how it is billed, whether the rate is published, and what it resolves rather than deflects.
5. **Breadth of fit.** How well the platform serves work that is not ecommerce support: internal IT, HR, B2B service, a non-retail product line.
6. **Setup effort and vendor maturity.** How much configuration the result needs, and how the platform reads to a security and procurement review.

Each vendor section states where it wins and, just as importantly, where it loses. A comparison where one tool sweeps every column is a comparison you should not trust.

## Gorgias: the ecommerce-native choice, priced by *ticket, not by headcount*.

Gorgias was built for online stores and has stayed there. Its plans are Starter at $10 a month for 50 billable tickets, Basic at $60 for 300, Pro at $360 for 2,000, Advanced at $900 for 5,000, and Enterprise on a custom quote, with annual billing saving up to 17 percent on everything except Starter [1].

### Where Gorgias wins

- **Ecommerce actions the AI can actually execute.** Its documentation describes AI Agent handling returns, order tracking, cancellations, and missing items, and taking configurable actions in connected tools including cancelling an order, processing a return, and updating a shipping address. It reads submitted images such as photos of damaged items, and responds in over 80 languages [4]. For a DTC queue, this is the whole argument.
- **Cost that ignores headcount.** Billing is per billable ticket, and Pro and Advanced carry unlimited agents [1]. If you run seasonal staff, part-timers, or an outsourced team, seats stop being a budget conversation entirely. That is a genuine structural advantage over any per-seat platform.
- **A published AI price and a legible meter.** AI Agent is $0.90 per resolved interaction on most plans and $1.00 on Starter, with 90 to 2,500 or more interactions included and overage at $1.50 [3]. Gorgias also states the rule plainly: a billable interaction is counted when the AI resolves a customer conversation entirely on its own. You can model the bill before you sign, which is more than the alternative offers.
- **Speed to live and multi-brand.** Setup is light relative to Zendesk, and multiple storefronts are supported across plans rather than gated to the top tier.

### Where Gorgias loses

- **Volume is the meter, so peaks cost money.** A billable ticket is counted when at least one message in the ticket is sent from your Gorgias helpdesk, whether that message comes from a human agent, AI Agent, or an automatic reply from a Rule [2]. Overage is $0.40 per extra ticket on Starter and Basic and steps down on higher tiers, though Gorgias publishes different Pro figures on different pages, so get your tier rate in writing. A Black Friday spike lands as a variable line item, which is the opposite of the per-seat predictability finance teams are used to.
- **The AI resolution is charged twice.** In Gorgias's own words, an automation fee and a ticket fee may apply to the same ticket only when the ticket is entirely resolved by AI Agent, without human intervention [2]. On Basic that is roughly $0.20 of ticket plus $0.90 of automation, about $1.10 for one AI-resolved conversation against a $0.20 bare ticket, five to six times the underlying cost. Accounts created before May 28, 2025 that have not adopted AI Agent with Shopping Assistant remain on the older either-or model.
- **Governance and reporting depth.** Analytics, quality assurance, SLA machinery, and permission granularity are lighter than Zendesk's. A large operation with a formal QA function and a reporting team will feel the ceiling.
- **Fit narrows outside ecommerce.** The advantage is ecommerce-shaped. Internal IT, HR service, or a non-retail line gets less out of it.

Deeper on the platform: our [honest guide to Gorgias alternatives](https://www.richpanel.com/learn/best-gorgias-alternatives), the [Gorgias AI alternatives breakdown](https://www.richpanel.com/learn/best-gorgias-ai-alternatives), and [what changes for subscription brands](https://www.richpanel.com/learn/best-gorgias-alternatives-for-subscription-brands).

## Zendesk: the general-purpose standard, with the *deepest configuration surface*.

Zendesk launched in 2007 and is the incumbent enterprise helpdesk across every industry, not just retail. Suite pricing runs Support Team at $19, Suite Team at $55, and Suite Professional at $115 per agent per month on annual billing, with Suite Enterprise through sales and 20 percent off for paying annually [5].

### Where Zendesk wins

- **Breadth beyond ecommerce.** One platform can serve customer support, internal IT, HR, and a B2B product line at once. If your desk is not purely a storefront queue, this is decisive, and it is the single clearest reason to pick Zendesk over Gorgias.
- **Governance and reporting.** Explore analytics, quality assurance, audit logs, granular roles, skill-based routing, and multi-brand at enterprise scale. Teams that run a formal QA function or live in dashboards get materially more here.
- **Autonomous AI is now bundled, not an add-on.** Zendesk states that all Zendesk Suite and Support plans, as well as legacy Support plans, include access to all AI agents capabilities [6]. The old separate advanced-AI add-on is gone. Any comparison still claiming Zendesk makes you buy autonomous AI separately is out of date.
- **You can cap the AI meter.** Zendesk documentation describes adding automated resolutions to your account and capping the number that can be consumed [6]. That is a real control, and worth knowing if you have read that the meter runs unchecked.
- **Procurement and maturity.** Nearly two decades of enterprise deployments, a large marketplace, and a compliance posture a security reviewer already recognises. For a buyer whose real question is whether they will be blamed for the choice, that carries weight that no feature table captures.

### Where Zendesk loses

- **Add-on stacking.** Suite Professional is $115, Copilot adds $50 per agent, and the Workforce Engagement bundle adds another $50, which takes a loaded seat to about $215 a month, roughly 87 percent above the base, before any AI resolution is metered [5].
- **The included AI allowance is thin.** Plans include 5 automated resolutions per agent per month on Team, 10 on Professional, and 15 on Enterprise, with a ceiling of 10,000 allocated automated resolutions per year [6]. A ten-agent Suite Professional team gets 100 included resolutions a month. Real automation volume sits far above that, and everything past it is metered.
- **The rate is not published.** Zendesk states you pay only for requests successfully resolved by the AI agent without escalation to a human, but does not publish the per-resolution price [5]. Independent 2026 analyses report roughly $1.50 on committed volume and about $2.00 pay as you go [7]. You cannot model this bill from the website, which is a real disadvantage against Gorgias's published $0.90.
- **Setup weight.** The flexibility that serves enterprises is configuration a small team must do or pay someone to do. Standing up Zendesk properly is a project, not an afternoon.
- **Marketed automation versus observed automation.** Zendesk markets autonomous resolution as high as 80 percent. In our buyer demo data and in third-party 2026 reviews, real-world autonomous resolution on the native AI of a traditional helpdesk more commonly lands near 10 to 20 percent [7].

Deeper on the platform: our [even-handed Zendesk review](https://www.richpanel.com/learn/zendesk-review), the [Zendesk pricing guide](https://www.richpanel.com/learn/zendesk-pricing), the [Zendesk AI agents guide](https://www.richpanel.com/learn/zendesk-ai-agents-guide), and [what its Shopify integration does and does not do](https://www.richpanel.com/learn/connect-zendesk-to-shopify).

## The two pricing models invert, so *one ratio settles the base bill*.

This is the part most comparisons skip, and it is the only price question that matters. Gorgias charges for volume and ignores headcount. Zendesk charges for headcount and ignores volume. Which is cheaper is therefore not a matter of opinion, it is a matter of your tickets-per-agent ratio, and you can compute the crossover yourself.

### The formula

Crossover tickets per agent per month = the Zendesk per-agent monthly price divided by your effective Gorgias per-ticket price. On annual billing, Gorgias Pro and Advanced both work out near **$0.15** per included ticket (about $299 for 2,000, about $747 for 5,000, after the 17 percent annual discount). So:

| Compared against | Zendesk seat (annual) | Crossover |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Zendesk Support Team | $19 | ~125 |
| Zendesk Suite Team | $55 | ~370 |
| Zendesk Suite Professional | $115 | ~770 |

Read it this way: if your team handles **fewer** tickets per agent per month than the crossover, Gorgias is the cheaper base platform, because you are paying for a modest pile of tickets while Zendesk would bill every seat. If it handles **more**, Zendesk is cheaper, because a lean team absorbing heavy volume buys few seats and a lot of tickets. This is also why Gorgias's unlimited-seat model matters most to teams carrying seasonal, part-time, or outsourced staff. Those are precisely the teams a per-seat bill punishes.

Two worked examples at list price, both against Suite Professional and its 770 crossover. Ten agents handling 4,000 tickets a month sit at 400 per agent, below the line: Zendesk is $1,150 in seats, Gorgias Advanced is about $747, so Gorgias wins by roughly $400 a month. Four agents handling the same 4,000 tickets sit at 1,000 per agent, above the line: Zendesk is $460, Gorgias is still about $747, so Zendesk wins by roughly $290. Identical volume, opposite answer, decided entirely by headcount.

### Three caveats that move the line

- **Gorgias tiers are stepped, not linear.** You only reach the $0.15 effective rate if your volume sits near the top of your tier. At 2,200 tickets on the Advanced plan you are paying about $0.34 each, which drops the crossover against Suite Professional from about 770 to about 340 and shrinks Gorgias's advantage sharply. Buy the tier that fits.
- **The AI meter is not in this arithmetic.** It is base platform only. Add Gorgias's $0.90 per resolved interaction, or Zendesk's unpublished per-resolution rate above a 5-to-15 per agent allowance, and the picture changes for both.
- **Add-ons sit outside it too.** Zendesk Copilot at $50 per agent and the Workforce Engagement bundle at $50 push the seat price up, which raises the crossover and favours Gorgias. Gorgias Voice from $70 a month plus usage pushes the other way.

All figures are list price as published on each vendor's own pages in July 2026. Negotiated enterprise rates will differ, which is exactly why the formula matters more than the table: substitute your quoted numbers and rerun it.

## Where Gorgias and Zendesk *answer the same way*.

Price model, ecommerce depth, and governance genuinely separate these two. On the question a lot of 2026 buyers actually care about, how much of the queue the AI takes off the team and what that costs, they are structurally the same, and it is worth being precise about why.

### Both charge again when the AI resolves

Neither includes meaningful autonomous AI in the base price. Gorgias documentation says an automation fee and a ticket fee may apply to the same ticket when it is entirely resolved by AI Agent without human intervention [2]. Zendesk includes 5 to 15 automated resolutions per agent per month and meters everything beyond that [6]. Different architectures, same shape: you pay for the conversation, and then you pay a second time for the AI that handled it. When a support leader says their helpdesk bill doubled after switching AI on, this stacking is the arithmetic, on either platform.

### Both are strongest at answering, which is not the same as resolving

Both native AIs are at their best answering from your knowledge base, and both market automation rates well above what teams report. Gorgias is the stronger of the two on real actions, and honestly so: its AI can cancel an order or process a return where Zendesk generally needs custom API work to reach the same outcome. But an answer-first bot that points a customer at an article deflects a ticket rather than resolving a problem, and the gap between those two words is where automation projects underdeliver. If your queue is answer-heavy, that is fine. If it is action-heavy, that gap is your entire project.

**The test that cuts through both:** pull 100 of your own past tickets and ask each vendor to run its AI against them live. Grade resolutions, not deflections, and ask what each one would have cost at that vendor's published or quoted rate. The number you get on your own tickets is the only one worth putting in a business case.

## If the second meter is the part that bothers you.

Everything above is a neutral read of two platforms we do not sell. This section is not neutral, so it is labeled: we make Richpanel. Read it only if the shared limit above, paying for the conversation and then paying again per AI resolution, is the part of the Gorgias-versus-Zendesk decision that actually bothers you. If it is not, the decision tree below still stands without us in it.

Richpanel is a team of AI agents that runs customer service end to end, alongside the helpdesk your people work in. Two line items, one bill: **$99 per seat** for the humans, and the AI metered per conversation at about **$0.20**, because you choose the model and the token budget. There is no second per-resolution fee stacked on a ticket or a seat. The AI is built to take real actions rather than surface an article: refunds, order changes, cancellations, returns, and subscription edits. A 50 percent resolution guarantee in 30 days, with your money back if we miss it, makes the ramp a probation period rather than a leap of faith. For switchers, a one-click import moves hundreds of thousands of historical conversations, macros, and tags in a single afternoon, we buy out up to 100 percent of your remaining term, and your current helpdesk keeps serving customers until the Richpanel setup is verified, then you cut over once. It runs for 3,000+ brands, is independently SOC 2 Type II audited, HIPAA-audited, and GDPR-audited, and rates 4.8 stars on the Shopify App Store across 115 reviews and 4.7 on G2. One published outcome: at the supplements brand Aeons, AI now sends 63 percent of all customer messages at a higher satisfaction score than the human team, 4.39 out of 5 against 4.33.

The honest limits, because this section is useless without them. Richpanel has no native voice: it integrates with Aircall, Dialpad, and JustCall rather than hosting telephony itself, so if voice must live in one pane, Zendesk Talk is the stronger answer. Our marketplace is smaller than Zendesk's, and if you need an obscure connector, Zendesk is likelier to have it. Our integration depth is greatest on Shopify even though the platform is general-purpose. And we are a smaller company than either, which is a legitimate thing for a risk-averse buyer to weigh. If you want the widest enterprise ecosystem and governance surface, Zendesk is the honest answer. If you want ecommerce-native workflow on a per-ticket bill, Gorgias is. Compare us on the 100-ticket test above, at a flat per-conversation rate, and only if the second meter is your problem. See the [Richpanel versus Gorgias comparison](https://www.richpanel.com/compare/gorgias), the [Richpanel versus Zendesk comparison](https://www.richpanel.com/compare/zendesk), or the migration guides for [Gorgias](https://www.richpanel.com/learn/migrate-from-gorgias-to-richpanel) and [Zendesk](https://www.richpanel.com/learn/migrate-from-zendesk-to-richpanel).

## The decision, in *plain conditions*.

Not a verdict, a decision tree. Match your situation to the line.

- **Choose Gorgias** if you are a DTC or ecommerce brand, your queue is order tracking, refunds, returns, and cancellations, and your tickets-per-agent number sits below the crossover. The unlimited-seat model is a further win if you run seasonal, part-time, or outsourced staff, since those seats are free.
- **Choose Zendesk** if your desk serves more than a storefront, you need reporting, QA, audit, and permission depth, you are scaling into hundreds of agents or multiple business units, or you have a security and procurement review that will be easier to pass with an incumbent. Also choose it if a lean team is absorbing heavy ticket volume, because a per-seat bill will simply be cheaper than paying for every one of those tickets.
- **Look past both** if what you actually want is for the AI to take a large share of the queue and act on it, and you do not want to pay a second meter to get it. That is an AI-native helpdesk question rather than a Gorgias-versus-Zendesk one, and it is worth pricing a flat per-conversation model against either.

### What to test on the vendor calls

Whichever way you lean, take these five to the demo:

- **The fully loaded quote.** At our seat count and ticket volume, what is the total monthly bill including the AI meter and every add-on? Refuse a single blended number.
- **The per-resolution rate, in writing (Zendesk).** What will we pay per automated resolution above our included allowance, at our committed volume, and what is the cap mechanism?
- **The double-charge question (Gorgias).** Confirm that an AI-resolved conversation consumes both a billable ticket and an automated interaction on our plan, and get the overage rate for our specific tier.
- **The 100-ticket resolution test.** Run your AI against a batch of our real historical tickets and show resolutions with actions taken, not deflections to a help article.
- **The migration reality.** List the automations, macros, and integrations you depend on and confirm the rebuild effort. Importing tickets is the easy part; rebuilding the automation layer is where the weeks go.

## Gorgias vs Zendesk: common questions.

### Is Gorgias or Zendesk better?

Neither is better in the abstract, they win different buyers. Gorgias is the ecommerce-native helpdesk: it is billed per billable ticket rather than per seat (Starter $10 for 50 tickets, Basic $60 for 300, Pro $360 for 2,000, Advanced $900 for 5,000), it allows unlimited agents from Pro up, and its AI Agent can cancel an order, process a return, or update a shipping address inside the ticket. Zendesk is the general-purpose enterprise standard: it is billed per agent (Support Team $19, Suite Team $55, Suite Professional $115 per agent per month on annual billing) and it goes deeper on reporting, governance, quality assurance, multi-brand, and multi-department service beyond ecommerce. Choose Gorgias for an ecommerce queue with a lean team. Choose Zendesk for breadth, governance, and procurement maturity.

### Is Gorgias cheaper than Zendesk?

It depends entirely on your tickets per agent per month, because the two models invert. Gorgias charges for volume and ignores headcount. Zendesk charges for headcount and ignores volume. The crossover is the Zendesk per-agent price divided by your effective Gorgias per-ticket price. On annual billing Gorgias Pro and Advanced work out near $0.15 per included ticket, so the base bills cross at roughly 370 tickets per agent per month against Zendesk Suite Team at $55, and roughly 770 against Suite Professional at $115. Below the crossover Gorgias is the cheaper base, above it Zendesk is. Put plainly, a per-ticket bill favours teams with plenty of agents and moderate volume, and a per-seat bill favours lean teams absorbing heavy volume. One caveat: Gorgias tiers are stepped, so you only reach that effective rate if your volume sits near the top of your tier.

### How do Gorgias and Zendesk charge for AI?

Both charge for AI on top of the base platform, but the packaging differs. Gorgias publishes its rate: $0.90 per resolved interaction on most plans and $1.00 on Starter, with 90 to 2,500 or more interactions included per month and overage at $1.50 per interaction. Gorgias documentation is explicit that an automation fee and a ticket fee can apply to the same ticket when the AI resolves it without human intervention, so one AI-resolved conversation carries both charges. Zendesk includes AI agent capability in all Suite and Support plans, but only 5 automated resolutions per agent per month on Team, 10 on Professional, and 15 on Enterprise, capped at 10,000 allocated per year. Zendesk does not publish the rate beyond that allowance, though its documentation does describe adding resolutions and capping consumption. Independent 2026 analyses report roughly $1.50 to $2.00 per resolution.

### Is Gorgias only for Shopify and ecommerce?

Gorgias is built for ecommerce and that is where its advantage is real: order context and actions live inside the ticket, and its AI Agent handles returns, order tracking, cancellations, and missing items natively. It is not literally Shopify-only, but the further you get from an online store the less of that advantage you are buying, and the more Zendesk's general-purpose breadth matters. If your support desk also serves internal IT, HR, or a non-retail product line, Zendesk is usually the better structural fit. If you are a DTC brand whose queue is order tracking, refunds, returns, and cancellations, Gorgias is designed for exactly that queue.

### What is the catch in Gorgias per-ticket pricing?

Volume is the meter, so your bill moves with demand rather than with staffing. A quiet month is cheap and a peak month is not, which is the opposite of the per-seat predictability finance teams are used to. Overage is $0.40 per extra ticket on Starter and Basic and steps down on higher tiers, so a Black Friday spike lands as a variable line item. The second effect is the AI meter: on current pricing a conversation the AI fully resolves carries both the ticket fee and the $0.90 automation fee, which on Basic works out to about $1.10 against a $0.20 bare ticket, roughly five to six times the underlying cost. Accounts created before May 28, 2025 that have not adopted AI Agent with Shopping Assistant remain on the older either-or model.

### Should I choose Gorgias, Zendesk, or an AI-native helpdesk?

Decide what your bottleneck actually is. If it is ecommerce workflow and a lean team on high volume, Gorgias is the honest answer. If it is governance, reporting depth, multi-department scope, or procurement and compliance review, Zendesk is. If your bottleneck is that you are paying for the ticket and then paying again per AI resolution, and you want the AI to resolve and act rather than deflect to a help article, that is an AI-native helpdesk question rather than a Gorgias versus Zendesk one. An AI-native platform such as Richpanel prices the AI as a single per-conversation meter at about $0.20 rather than stacking a resolution fee on a ticket or seat fee. Price all three against the same 100 of your own real tickets before you decide.

## Where these facts come from.

Inline citations [1] to [7] map to the entries below. Every pricing figure was read from the vendor's own live pages on July 28, 2026. Vendor pricing and packaging change often, so verify before you sign.

1. **Gorgias helpdesk plans (verified July 28, 2026).** Starter $10/mo for 50 tickets and 3 agents, Basic $60 for 300 tickets and 3 agents, Pro $360 for 2,000 tickets with unlimited agents, Advanced $900 for 5,000 tickets with unlimited agents, Enterprise custom; overage $0.40 per extra ticket on Starter and Basic; annual billing saves up to 17 percent on all plans except Starter. Note that Gorgias publishes differing Pro overage figures across its own pages, so confirm your tier rate in writing. [gorgias.com/blog/gorgias-plan](https://www.gorgias.com/blog/gorgias-plan)
2. **Gorgias billing model, verbatim (verified July 28, 2026).** A ticket is billable when at least one message in the ticket is sent from your Gorgias helpdesk, whether from a human agent, AI Agent, or an automatic reply from a Rule. An automation fee and a ticket fee may apply to the same ticket only when the ticket is entirely resolved by AI Agent, without human intervention. Accounts created before May 28, 2025 that have not adopted AI Agent with Shopping Assistant remain on the legacy either-or model. [docs.gorgias.com how you are billed](https://docs.gorgias.com/en-US/how-youre-billed-for-using-gorgias-199385)
3. **Gorgias AI Agent pricing (verified July 28, 2026).** $0.90 per resolved interaction on most plans, $1.00 on Starter; a billable interaction is counted when the AI resolves a customer conversation entirely on its own; 90 to 2,500 or more interactions included per month; overage $1.50 per interaction on Support plus Shopping Assistant plans. [gorgias.com/blog/ai-agent-pricing](https://www.gorgias.com/blog/ai-agent-pricing)
4. **Gorgias AI Agent capabilities (verified July 28, 2026).** Operates on email, chat, and SMS; handles returns, order tracking, cancellations, and missing items; configurable Actions including cancelling an order, processing a return, and updating a shipping address; reads submitted images; responds in over 80 languages; escalates when it cannot confidently respond, hits a sensitive topic, or detects frustration. [docs.gorgias.com AI Agent explained](https://docs.gorgias.com/en-US/ai-agent-explained-497772)
5. **Zendesk public pricing (verified July 28, 2026).** Support Team $19, Suite Team $55, Suite Professional $115 per agent per month on annual billing, Suite Enterprise through sales, 20 percent off annual; Copilot add-on $50 per agent, Workforce Engagement bundle $50 per agent, Contact Center $83 per agent; AI agent billing described as paying only for customer requests successfully resolved by the AI agent without escalation to a human, with no per-resolution rate published. [zendesk.com/pricing](https://www.zendesk.com/pricing/)
6. **Zendesk automated resolution allowances (verified July 28, 2026).** All Zendesk Suite and Support plans, as well as legacy Support plans, include access to all AI agents capabilities. Included automated resolutions are 5 per agent per month on Team, 10 on Professional and Growth, and 15 on Enterprise, with a maximum of 10,000 allocated automated resolutions per year. Exceeding the allotment can incur overage charges, and resolutions can be added and capped. [support.zendesk.com automated resolutions](https://support.zendesk.com/hc/en-us/articles/6931689272090-Moving-to-automated-resolutions-from-existing-pricing-plans)
7. **Zendesk per-resolution rate and real-world resolution (third-party reported, 2026).** Zendesk does not publish automated-resolution overage rates; independent 2026 analyses report roughly $1.50 per resolution on committed volume and about $2.00 pay as you go. Traditional helpdesks market autonomous resolution as high as 80 percent; field outcomes in the Richpanel buyer demo dataset and third-party 2026 reviews more commonly land near 10 to 20 percent on native answer-first AI. Underlying call data is confidential; methodology available on request via [amit@richpanel.com](mailto:amit@richpanel.com). [eesel.ai resolution-rate analysis](https://www.eesel.ai/blog/zendesk-ai-agent-metrics-resolution-rate)

v1.0 (2026-07-28): initial publication. Plan prices, allowances, and add-on figures are a snapshot of each vendor's public pages as of the publication date. Zendesk per-resolution overage rates are third-party reported because Zendesk does not publish them. Crossover figures are derived from list prices and are illustrative, not a quote.